Skip to main content

Week 1: Two Cultures

Charles Percy Snow bridging the gap between Humanities and Science.
I found this week’s discussion on the emergence of Two Cultures(the Arts and Sciences) particularly interesting because of the indecisiveness I experienced throughout my academic path at UCLA. I found myself relating with the feelings expressed by Charles Percy Snow in his essay “The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution”.  He found himself in a conflicting position, because “By training [he] was a scientist: by vocation [he] was a writer” (1). I was able to relate with this lack of belongingness when I first arrived at UCLA, because in my past schooling I excelled in the science discipline, but always had enjoyed writing. This conflict was eventually resolved with the discovery of Psychology – I felt that it was a happy medium as a marriage between the science and humanities fields. 

UCLA Campus Map.
However, after reading Snow’s essay, I began to question why the struggle between these two fields even existed.  As a student pursuing her degree, I was forced to decide between two fields that were presented to me as distinct and even opposite.  This distinction was something I had internalized long before, showing the propagation of this divide throughout society. The discussion in Lecture III even discusses the stark geographical separation between the arts and sciences on our UCLA campus, keeping North Campus buildings for the Arts, and South Campus for the Sciences.  Prior to reading the materials from this week, I would have explained this as basic and practical organization of students and faculty.

The merging of science and art. Illustration by Corinna McAtee.
But now I am inclined to think otherwise – to question why there must be such an abstract and physical separation between the two. Especially when one can present a strong argument that the two fields in fact overlap, and would benefit from collaboration as discussed in Victoria Vesna’s article “Toward a Third Culture: Being in Between”.  I understand that there is a movement now to bridge the gap between these fields, but I also have come to believe that this cannot happen until both sides learn to not rely on the stereotypes that each hold for the other, and find a mutual respect.

Sources

Graham-Rowe, Duncan. "John Brockman: Matchmaking with Science and Art." Wired 03 Feb. 2011: n. pag. Web.

Krauss, Lawrence M. "An Update on C. P. Snow's "Two Cultures"." Scientific American. N.p., 06 Aug. 2009. Web. 09 Apr. 2017. 

Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Cambridge UP, 1959. Print.

"UCLA Space Management System." UCLA Space Management System. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2017.

Vesna, Victoria. "Toward a Third Culture: Being In Between." Leonardo. 34 (2001): 121-125. Print.

"Visualisation and Inspiration: The Merging of Science and Art." Lateral Magazine. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2017.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 8: Nanotech + Art

Lotus flower. I came into this week having little to no knowledge about nanotechnology, and while I still found myself getting a little lost during the lecture videos, I feel like I learned important information about a topic that is extremely relevant in the scientific world today.   In the lecture video part 3, one topic that really caught my attention was when Professor Gimzewski introduced the compound called titanium dioxide.   This nanoparticle has self-cleaning properties that are also found in the Asian Lotus plant.   When looking at the lotus plant with a reflection electron microscope, you can see that the leaves are not smooth, but instead have small waxy bumps.    This design has been adopted in the nanotechnology field to create surfaces that are water resistant and self-cleaning.   I think this technology can and will be extremely useful in several instances in our society.   Being able to manufacture materials that are self-cleaning would save lo

Week 6: BioTech + Art

 This week, I was interested in learning about the topic of BioTechnology and Art because I feel that now more than ever, this field is rapidly becoming integrated into our society.  In Lecture Part 1, I found the conversation about the fluorescent bunny, named Alba, to be extremely interesting.  This bunny was injected with bioluminescent genes from a jellyfish as a fertilized egg, and now is basically glow in the dark. Alba, the genetically modified bunny. In the scientific world, this manipulation genetic engineering of the bunny can be linked to several purposes.   These scientists were hoping to be able to use the bioluminescence to place on certain genes in the human body and see how they move throughout the bodily systems.   This is especially important in cancer research because if scientists were able to detect and track cancer cells in the body, it would lead to faster detection and hopefully initiation of treatment.   Eduardo Kac   The part that was especially in

Week 4: Medtech + Art

I am particularly interested by the rapid evolution of technology in the medical field because of how much technology influences every aspect of our lives – but this week I enjoyed learning about where the field of medicine originated. I found that reading the Hippocratic Oath was interesting because of how it has changed over the years.   In the original oath, its contents were generally based off of respecting the body, the patient, and the art form that is medicine – encouraging those who have this knowledge to share it with others.   It is interesting how the field of medicine has changed since then, in that it is seen as separate from art, and the knowledge of medicine has been restricted to those who are intelligent enough to survive medical school as well as have the monetary stability to afford it.   To me, this modern view of medicine does not seem to coincide with the original standards it was founded on as seen in The Hippocratic Oath.              And wh