Skip to main content

Event #1

Sophie Lamparter presenting.
I decided to attend the art symposium for my first event blog and was fortunate enough to hear two presentations by Sophie Lamparter and Dr. Olivia Osborne.  Both of these lecturers embodied the practice of combining art and science in their presentations, and I was extremely impressed by the ingenuity that their projects involved.  I think that by attending this symposium, I was able to grasp the seemingly abstract idea that art and science are connected by seeing the real-life examples that they had created in their research.
Dr. Olivia Osborne and I outside of the symposium.
In Sophie Lamparter’s presentation, she mentioned a project that really caught my attention because of its futuristic nature.  She introduced a project that her company is working on called the “Science Communication Project” where they are building two greenhouses side by side and creating a unique and separate type of environment within each of them.  The contents of one greenhouse will represent how plants are growing now, and the contents of the other greenhouse will represent how plants will grow in 2058.  This project is hoping to bring to light the extreme environmental issues that we are likely to encounter in the near future unless we severely change our behaviors as a human race.  I thought this was an incredible example of topics we have recently covered in class because it takes the science factor to predict the conditions in 2058 and how plants will be growing, but also turns it into an interactive exhibit where people will be able to walk through and experience the difference themselves.  This sort of staging is definitely characteristic of the artistic field, but in this circumstance, it is aiding these scientists to spread awareness to the population about the reality of climate change.


A painting from Dr. Osborne's "Cry Me a River California" series.
In Olivia Osborne’s lecture, I found that it tied in nicely with Lamparter’s remarks because she spoke a lot about the importance of using art as a vessel for scientific information.  Dr. Osborne related this to her piece named “Cry Me a River, California” which were a series of water color paintings done on canvas that were designed to reference the drought occurring in California.  She used her talents in painting to create a piece that begged the question, “If art can trap water, why can’t we?”  She strategically used her artwork to spread awareness about the drought to a group of people who were not involved with the field of science.  My favorite part about her presentation was when she said that many people are intimidated by science because we, in general, have a lack of curiosity.  I completely agreed with her that scientists can use art as a tool to present their ideas to the general population in a less intimidating manner.  This might inspire a new wave of people to overcome their fear and contribute new ideas and solutions to our worlds’ problems.  I would highly recommend attending the art symposium, because if the rest of the speakers were as engaging as Lamparter and Osborne, I can guarantee you will learn something extremely valuable in terms of this class, but also your life.



References
Osborne, Olivia. Cry Me a River California. 2014. The California Drought Series. Olivia Osborne Art. Web. 23 Apr. 2017.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 8: Nanotech + Art

Lotus flower. I came into this week having little to no knowledge about nanotechnology, and while I still found myself getting a little lost during the lecture videos, I feel like I learned important information about a topic that is extremely relevant in the scientific world today.   In the lecture video part 3, one topic that really caught my attention was when Professor Gimzewski introduced the compound called titanium dioxide.   This nanoparticle has self-cleaning properties that are also found in the Asian Lotus plant.   When looking at the lotus plant with a reflection electron microscope, you can see that the leaves are not smooth, but instead have small waxy bumps.    This design has been adopted in the nanotechnology field to create surfaces that are water resistant and self-cleaning.   I think this technology can and will be extremely useful in several instances in our society.   Being able to manufacture materials that are self-cleaning would save lo

Week 6: BioTech + Art

 This week, I was interested in learning about the topic of BioTechnology and Art because I feel that now more than ever, this field is rapidly becoming integrated into our society.  In Lecture Part 1, I found the conversation about the fluorescent bunny, named Alba, to be extremely interesting.  This bunny was injected with bioluminescent genes from a jellyfish as a fertilized egg, and now is basically glow in the dark. Alba, the genetically modified bunny. In the scientific world, this manipulation genetic engineering of the bunny can be linked to several purposes.   These scientists were hoping to be able to use the bioluminescence to place on certain genes in the human body and see how they move throughout the bodily systems.   This is especially important in cancer research because if scientists were able to detect and track cancer cells in the body, it would lead to faster detection and hopefully initiation of treatment.   Eduardo Kac   The part that was especially in

Week 4: Medtech + Art

I am particularly interested by the rapid evolution of technology in the medical field because of how much technology influences every aspect of our lives – but this week I enjoyed learning about where the field of medicine originated. I found that reading the Hippocratic Oath was interesting because of how it has changed over the years.   In the original oath, its contents were generally based off of respecting the body, the patient, and the art form that is medicine – encouraging those who have this knowledge to share it with others.   It is interesting how the field of medicine has changed since then, in that it is seen as separate from art, and the knowledge of medicine has been restricted to those who are intelligent enough to survive medical school as well as have the monetary stability to afford it.   To me, this modern view of medicine does not seem to coincide with the original standards it was founded on as seen in The Hippocratic Oath.              And wh